Louis Vuitton Malletier vs Atul Jaggi & Anr. - Latest Laws
2010年5月13日 · The plaintiff also claims to be the first foreign company permitted to set up its own duty free outlets in the country; the plaintiff‟s trademarks "LOUIS VUITTON", word mark "LV" logo and the monogram patterns are also registered in India under classes 3, 14, 18 and 25 with the Registrar of Trademarks under Registration Nos. 441451, 448229B ...
Louis Vuitton Malletier vs Atul Jaggi & Anr. on 13 May, 2010
The plaintiff also claims to be the first foreign company permitted to set up its own duty free outlets in the country; the plaintiff‟s trademarks "LOUIS VUITTON", word mark "LV" logo and the monogram patterns are also registered in India under classes 3, 14, 18 and 25 with the Registrar of Trademarks under Registration Nos. 441451, 448229B ...
louis+vuitton | Indian Case Law - CaseMine
2015年8月20日 · Whether the use of the trade marks LOUIS VUITTON, the LV logo, the Toile Monogram and/or any other deceptively... Louis Vuitton Malletier v. Futuretimes Technology India (P) Ltd.
Louis Vuitton Malletier v. Atul Jaggi | Delhi High Court - CaseMine
The plaintiff also claims to be selling jewellery bearing “LV” logo, Toile Monogram and Murakami Monogram, which include rings, earrings, bracelets, necklaces, pendants, charms and hairpins. The plaintiff also claims to be the first foreign company permitted to set up its own duty free outlets in the country.
Intellectual property rights in the Fashion Industry: designs ...
The plaintiff was awarded damages in another case. In the case Louis Vuitton malletier vs Atul Jaggi, it was alleged that the designers are not only allowed to protect the logo or brand name but also the unique characteristics of the products.
The emerging connection between crime, fashion and …
2021年3月9日 · Atul Jaggi and another, the Delhi High Court restrained the defendants for infringing and passing off their famous trademarks “LOUIS VUITTION” and “LV” by using identical marks and granted damages.
Counterfeiting Louis Vuitton ? – The Delhi High Court Decides.
2011年5月20日 · Atul Jaggi & Anr., awarded permanent injunction in favour of Louis Vuitton (Plaintiff) thereby restraining Atul Jaggi (the Defendants) from selling any product bearing the "LOUIS VUITTON" mark or any other mark deceptively or confusingly similar to it. Louis Vuitton also claimed an order for delivery up of all finished and unfinished materials ...
Counterfeiting Louis Vuitton ? - The Delhi High Court Decides.
The Delhi High Court in the case of Louis Vuitton Malletier v. Atul Jaggi & Anr., awarded permanent injunction in favour of Louis Vuitton (Plaintiff) thereby restraining Atul Jaggi (the Defendants) from selling any product bearing the "LOUIS VUITTON" mark or any other mark deceptively or confusingly similar to it.
Louis Vuitton Malletier vs Atul Jaggi - Supreme Today
LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER VS MANOJ KHURANA. The judgment establishes the well-known status of trademarks under Section 11(6) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 and emphasizes the protection of well-known marks against infringement. 20 Aug 15
Delhi High Court: Louis Vuitton successfully enforces rights in its LV ...
2022年9月28日 · Consequently, the Court decreed the suit based on the statements made by the parties and Louis Vuitton was able to successfully enforce its rights in its “LV logos” with the court proceedings...