What is a smoke testing and what will it do for me?
2009年4月13日 · 70. Smoke testing is a set of basic cheap to run tests that precede actual testing. It aims to verify that the build is deployed successfully and that all test env. aspects are running and ready for the actual test process. It saves you bringing the full extent of your testing wrath down a faulty build and just realizing that you have been ...
testing - What are the differences between unit tests, integration ...
2019年7月18日 · Smoke testing: Smoke testing is also known as build version testing. Smoke testing is the initial testing process exercised to check whether the software under test is ready/stable for further testing. Regression testing: Regression testing is repeated testing. Whether new software is effected in another module or not.
What is the difference between smoke testing and sanity testing?
2015年2月19日 · Difference between smoke testing and sanity testing Smoke testing. Smoke testing is used to test all areas of the application without going into too deep. A smoke test always use an automated test or a written set of tests. It is always scripted. Smoke testing is designed to include every part of the application in a not thorough or detailed way.
testing - What is a smoke test? - Stack Overflow
2010年10月29日 · After a smoke test proves that "the pipes will not leak, the keys seal properly, the circuit will not burn, or the software will not crash outright," the assembly is ready for more stressful testing. In computer programming and software testing, smoke testing is a preliminary to further testing, which should reveal simple failures severe enough ...
When should Smoke and Adhoc testing to be done [closed]
2022年9月27日 · Smoke testing determines the stability of a deployed software build. As a result of the smoke test, the QA team can proceed with further software testing. When to do Smoke Testing: As soon as QA gets the build. When a company gives the build/software to the customer, chances are their team might miss copying a few files/installing the software.
What are unit testing and integration testing, and what other …
2009年1月13日 · Feature testing: this may cut across units, and is the focus of TDD. Black-box testing: testing only the public interface with no knowledge of how the thing works. Glass-box testing: testing all parts of a thing with full knowledge of how it works. Regression testing: test-cases constructed to reproduce bugs, to ensure that they do not reappear ...
testing - What is a sanity test/check - Stack Overflow
2016年8月20日 · The difference between smoke and sanity, at least as I understand it, is that smoke test is a quick test to see that after a build the application is good enough for testing. Then, you do a sanity test which would tell you if a particular functional area is good enough that it actually makes sense to proceed with tests on this area. Example:
Why are "smoke tests" called "smoke tests"? - Stack Overflow
2016年9月1日 · The term originates in hardware repair and has been applied to software. It's intended to be a quick test to see if the application "catches on fire" when run for the first time. As stated above it's just to make sure you don't waste a bunch of folks time by setting them loose on something that's obviously broken. It comes from hardware. After ...
software quality - Why can't smoke testing be done by developer ...
2017年5月11日 · 2. Ideally all testing is done by Devs: This makes it clearer that introducing bad code slows down the team. It also allows for more optimal automated testing as Devs can automate much better since they usually write code better. It makes people in the team more cross-functional being able to do a bigger variety of work.
what is smoke testing? And at what circumstances we can use …
2014年10月8日 · Smoke testing also known as Build version Testing. Smoke testing is the initial testing process exercised to check whether the software under test is ready/stable for further testing. sanity testing is a type of testing to check the capability of a new software version is able to perform well enough to accept it for a major testing effort.